JIANRUNTECH / GEO-SCORE
314 well-known sites, scored on whether an AI answer engine can find, parse, trust and cite them. One open rubric, one public tool, the same eight-page sample for every site. Nothing here is a black box — re-run it yourself.
80 sites have a gate check at zero — a retrieval crawler cannot get the content, so nothing else on the page matters. Two very different problems live inside that number.
Their robots.txt disallows AI retrieval crawlers by name. A site that does not want to be quoted is not misconfigured, and this rubric reports it as it is.amazon.com, expeditors.com, figma.com, healthline.com, jdcloud.com, june.so, khanacademy.org, lexisnexis.com, lonelyplanet.com, loom.com, mercadolibre.com, payoneer.com, qcloud.com, stackoverflow.blog, techcrunch.com, theregister.com, theverge.com, together.ai, webmd.com
Body copy only exists after JavaScript runs. The content is there and a browser sees it; a retrieval crawler gets an empty shell. This group almost certainly did not choose it.01.ai, 4px.com, agoda.com, airtable.com, aliexpress.com, aliyun.com, baichuan-ai.com, bigmodel.cn, booking.com, clevelandclinic.org, cohere.com, continue.dev, datahawk.co, dingtalk.com, drizzle.team, duolingo.com, fanruan.com, feishu.cn, freecodecamp.org, huoban.com, jushuitan.com, lianlianpay.com, megvii.com, narwal.com, obsidian.md, oceanwing.com, payoneer.cn, perpetua.io, rakuten.com, roborock.com, sellersprite.com, sf-express.com, shein.com, shopee.com, skyscanner.net, solidjs.com, stepfun.com, temu.com, turso.tech, walmart.com, weaviate.io, windsurf.com, wps.cn, xiaomi.com, yuque.com
llms.txt, Organization schema, visible dates and real bylines — conventions that spread through the English web first and have not crossed over.Bars are counts of sites per ten-point band. The rubric is not graded on a curve; this is the distribution that falls out of it.
No install, no dependencies, no account. Python 3.8+ and about twenty seconds.
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jianruntech/geo-score/main/cli/geo_score.py \ | python3 - yoursite.com
Add --explain for the evidence behind every check and what the next tier asks for, or --compare competitor.com to see the two side by side.
Click a column to sort. The score is readiness — whether an engine can cite the site, not whether one does.
| SITE | SCORE | BAND | SECTOR | BIGGEST GAPS |
|---|
| SECTOR | SITES | MEDIAN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing / CRM | 17 | 73 | |
| Cloud & DevOps | 24 | 72.5 | |
| Professional services | 9 | 70 | |
| AI | 29 | 66 | |
| Payments / Fintech | 12 | 63.0 | |
| Developer tools | 38 | 62.0 | |
| SaaS / Productivity | 22 | 59.5 | |
| Education | 12 | 55.0 | |
| Healthcare | 12 | 51.0 | |
| Ecommerce | 14 | 49.5 | |
| China / enterprise | 10 | 46.0 | |
| China / AI | 13 | 45 | |
| Logistics / Freight | 10 | 42.0 | |
| Media / Publishing | 10 | 40.0 | |
| Travel | 10 | 40.0 | |
| Manufacturing / Industrial | 11 | 39 | |
| China / consumer | 21 | 38 | |
| China / cloud | 9 | 37 | |
| Cross-border services | 20 | 37.0 | |
| China / no-code | 11 | 36 |